Tap WaterIndex

← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Kings Grant S/D

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
14
detected
460
people served
0
health-based violations
North Carolina rankingsLead in North CarolinaPFAS in North Carolina
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Gaston

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
69
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2004-02-08
Other Monitoring Resolved 2004-02-08
MR Monitoring Resolved 2000-01-01 → 2002-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2000-01-01 → 2002-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2000-01-01 → 2002-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2000-01-01 → 2002-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2000-01-01 → 2002-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2000-01-01 → 2002-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2000-01-01 → 2002-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2000-01-01 → 2002-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
513.4 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 680 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
2740 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 14/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
21.85 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
74 µg/L 93%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 81 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane
24.825 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
15.025 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.8 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
27.95 µg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 30.1 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
10.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.2 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
6.55 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Uranium
1.35143 µg/L 4.5%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3559 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.695 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 4/4 LCR 2025
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.76 pCi/L 35%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.8 pCi/L
2/5 SYR4 2012–2019
61 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PATEL, HARSHNA
Phone
800-525-7990
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Kings Grant S/D

Is Kings Grant S/D tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Kings Grant S/D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kings Grant S/D's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kings Grant S/D serve?

Kings Grant S/D reports serving 460 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Kings Grant S/D had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 69 violations on file for Kings Grant S/D, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.