← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Kings Mountain, Town of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
14
detected
14,784
people served
15
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cleveland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

15
health-based violations
60
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0068 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0053 µg/L 4/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
79.7 µg/L 100%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 89 µg/L
127/127 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
46.1 µg/L 77%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 56 µg/L
127/127 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13.525 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
59.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 74.6 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
19.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
25.53 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.1 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
65/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
137.05 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 211 µg/L
18/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2025
Fluoride
795.5 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 799 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
5/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
8 µg/L 53%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
3/90 SYR4 2013–2019
92 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
KONDZIELSKI, AARON
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Kings Mountain, Town of

Is Kings Mountain, Town of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Kings Mountain, Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kings Mountain, Town of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kings Mountain, Town of serve?

Kings Mountain, Town of reports serving 14,784 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Kings Mountain, Town of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 60 violations on file for Kings Mountain, Town of, of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.