Is Zemosa Acres Water Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Cabarrus

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
TTHM	86.895 µg/L 109% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L worst single sample: 103.2 µg/L	32/35	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	55.645 µg/L 93% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 71 µg/L	32/35	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	11.8 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 13.5 µg/L	31/34	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	73.55 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 92.2 µg/L	31/34	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	27.5 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 37.1 µg/L	31/34	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	27.42 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 30.3 µg/L	30/34	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.145 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3 µg/L	20/34	SYR4	2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	3.5 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L	11/34	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	130.7 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 137 µg/L	7/30	SYR4	2012–2018
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	7/7	LCR	2025
Lead	13.5 µg/L 90% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 14 µg/L	2/30	SYR4	2012–2018

3 contaminants tested, none detected

BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: PATEL, HARSHNA
Phone: 800-525-7990
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Zemosa Acres Water

Is Zemosa Acres Water tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Zemosa Acres Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Zemosa Acres Water's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Zemosa Acres Water serve?

Zemosa Acres Water reports serving 650 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Zemosa Acres Water had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 35 violations on file for Zemosa Acres Water, of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.