← Montana

Tap water quality report

Cherry Creek Estates Llc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
13
detected
600
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Yellowstone

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
68
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
9.955 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
52 µg/L
No EPA limit set
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
25.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
59.85 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 65 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
59.55 µg/L 99%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 69 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
32.85 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
19/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.6495 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7600 µg/L
14/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2026
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.915 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L
12/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
111.3 µg/L 8.6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 123 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.8135 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8300 µg/L
4/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
3 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/10 SYR4 2014–2017
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Bromoform

Utility contact

Contact
RUDOLPH, AMANDA
Phone
406-254-2555

Frequently asked questions about Cherry Creek Estates Llc

Is Cherry Creek Estates Llc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Cherry Creek Estates Llc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cherry Creek Estates Llc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cherry Creek Estates Llc serve?

Cherry Creek Estates Llc reports serving 600 people in Montana, per its EPA record.

Has Cherry Creek Estates Llc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 68 violations on file for Cherry Creek Estates Llc, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.