← Montana

Tap water quality report

Fort Peck Rural County Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
13
detected
663
people served
24
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Valley

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

24
health-based violations
30
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
943 µg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 980 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
21 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
63.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 68 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
27.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
87.7 µg/L 110%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 92 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
55.3 µg/L 92%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 63 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
26.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
25/27 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
4.3 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
19/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
16/27 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0050 mg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.8750 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9800 µg/L
11/27 SYR4 2013–2019
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Bromoform

Utility contact

Contact
YOUNG, JENNIFER
Phone
406-526-3529

Frequently asked questions about Fort Peck Rural County Water District

Is Fort Peck Rural County Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Fort Peck Rural County Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fort Peck Rural County Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fort Peck Rural County Water District serve?

Fort Peck Rural County Water District reports serving 663 people in Montana, per its EPA record.

Has Fort Peck Rural County Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 30 violations on file for Fort Peck Rural County Water District, of which 24 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.