Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 660 µg/L 6.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 76.15 µg/L 5.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 80 µg/L | 12/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2024 |
| Arsenic | 2 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 60 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.43 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 3.18 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.97 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 190 µg/L 4.8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 11.66 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.081 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2.65 µg/L 4.4% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2 pCi/L 40% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 0.7300 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
56 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Golden Age Village
Is Golden Age Village tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Golden Age Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Golden Age Village's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Lead, Arsenic, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Golden Age Village serve?
Golden Age Village reports serving 180 people in Montana, per its EPA record.
Has Golden Age Village had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 34 violations on file for Golden Age Village, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.