Is Emerald View Park Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Yellowstone

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2024-12-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2024-12-30
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2021-07-01
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2021-07-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2021-01-01 → 2021-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2021-01-01 → 2021-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2021-01-01 → 2021-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2021-01-01 → 2021-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2021-01-01 → 2021-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2021-01-01 → 2021-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	204.5 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 290 µg/L	20/20	SYR4	2013–2018
Lead	2.855 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L	18/20	SYR4	2013–2018
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	13/13	LCR	2024
Chloroform	49.94 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 52.1 µg/L	5/5	SYR4	2015–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	19.46 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 20.9 µg/L	5/5	SYR4	2015–2019
TTHM	61.92 µg/L 77% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 65.3 µg/L	5/5	SYR4	2015–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	39.26 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 40.1 µg/L	5/5	SYR4	2015–2019
Bromodichloromethane	10.65 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 10.8 µg/L	4/5	SYR4	2015–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.425 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L	4/5	SYR4	2015–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	15.02 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 15.2 µg/L	4/4	SYR4	2015–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	7.07 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L	2/5	SYR4	2015–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	0.4300 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/5	SYR4	2015–2019

2 contaminants tested, none detected

BromoformMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: RAINBOW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
Phone: 406-248-9028
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Emerald View Park

Is Emerald View Park tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Emerald View Park's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Emerald View Park's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Emerald View Park serve?

Emerald View Park reports serving 320 people in Montana, per its EPA record.

Has Emerald View Park had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 27 violations on file for Emerald View Park, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.