Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-12-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 5060 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5400 µg/L | 46/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2024 |
| Copper | 764.9 µg/L 59% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 944 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 10 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 6.25 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8 µg/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 5.18 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.24 µg/L | 7/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 15.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.9 µg/L | 6/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.7375 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.07 µg/L | 6/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 12.322 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.8 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 4.17 pCi/L 28% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.3 pCi/L | 3/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.9525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.54 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 23.48 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 23.9 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 20.79 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 21.5 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.991 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.18 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 76.95 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 77 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.8250 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8400 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.435 pCi/L 29% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.5 pCi/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.5618 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5630 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 884.85 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 887 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Selenium | 2.95 µg/L 5.9% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
54 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Tri County Water District
Is Tri County Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Tri County Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Tri County Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Copper, Combined Uranium, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Tri County Water District serve?
Tri County Water District reports serving 470 people in Montana, per its EPA record.
Has Tri County Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 214 violations on file for Tri County Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.