Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2023-08-01 → 2023-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2023-08-01 → 2023-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2023-08-01 → 2023-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2023-08-01 → 2023-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2023-08-01 → 2023-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2023-08-01 → 2023-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-09-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-09-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-09-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-09-01 → 2022-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride | 1100 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1300 µg/L | 94/94 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 67/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 60.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 97 µg/L | 67/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 76.7 µg/L 96% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 117 µg/L | 67/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L | 63/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 22.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L | 59/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 50.2 µg/L 84% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 61 µg/L | 59/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 27.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L | 59/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 163 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 437 µg/L | 58/61 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.8640 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 37/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 5 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 26/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.58 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L | 25/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 520 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0030 mg/L 20% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.22 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 9/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 5.65 µg/L 57% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 46.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/4 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Combined Uranium | 3 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Xylenes, Total | 1.5 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
76 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Miles City City of
Is Miles City City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Miles City City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Miles City City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Miles City City of serve?
Miles City City of reports serving 9,565 people in Montana, per its EPA record.
Has Miles City City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 80 violations on file for Miles City City of, of which 22 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.