← Montana

Tap water quality report

Kalispell Public Works

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 104 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

104
contaminants tested
19
detected
25,000
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Flathead

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
222
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-01-01 → 2001-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-01-01 → 2001-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-01-01 → 2001-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFHXS 0.0050 µg/L 2/16 2023
PFOS 0.0066 µg/L 1/16 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate-Nitrite
2502 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4720 µg/L
65/65 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
142 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 360 µg/L
59/61 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate
2484 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2510 µg/L
34/34 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
8 µg/L 53%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
31/61 SYR4 2014–2017
Barium
140 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
216 µg/L 5.4%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2023
TTHM
2.75 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
11/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
3.55 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
10/12 SYR4 2015–2017
Chloroform
1.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
9/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
0.9910 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1 µg/L
7/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.4275 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.4300 µg/L
6/23 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3.525 pCi/L 24%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.6 pCi/L
6/12 SYR4 2015–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
0.4275 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4300 µg/L
6/23 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.87 pCi/L 37%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.9 pCi/L
4/12 SYR4 2015–2017
Selenium
2 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
4/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
0.6070 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6100 µg/L
2/48 SYR4 2012–2019
85 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LOUDERMILK, TERRI
Phone
406-758-7722
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Kalispell Public Works

Is Kalispell Public Works tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Kalispell Public Works's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kalispell Public Works's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kalispell Public Works serve?

Kalispell Public Works reports serving 25,000 people in Montana, per its EPA record.

Has Kalispell Public Works had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 222 violations on file for Kalispell Public Works, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.