Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 42 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46 µg/L | 35/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 128 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 136 µg/L | 35/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 20 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 35/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 159.6 µg/L 200% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 168 µg/L | 35/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 261 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 436 µg/L | 29/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 45.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 58 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 91.45 µg/L 152% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 98 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 45.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 56 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L | 26/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L | 14/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2018 |
| Bromoform | 1.755 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 10/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 142 µg/L 947% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 212 µg/L | 8/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.065 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 8/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 210 µg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2.8 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.865 pCi/L 37% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.9 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Hexachlorocyclopentadiene | 0.1580 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1600 µg/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 3 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
44 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Harlem City of
Is Harlem City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Harlem City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Harlem City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Harlem City of serve?
Harlem City of reports serving 820 people in Montana, per its EPA record.
Has Harlem City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 664 violations on file for Harlem City of, of which 306 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.