Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-06-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-06-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-06-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-06-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 8670 µg/L 87% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10400 µg/L | 110/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 401.8 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1670 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 19/19 | LCR | 2017 |
| Lead | 6.5 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8 µg/L | 16/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.465 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.73 µg/L | 11/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 3 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
| Lithium | 24.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 10/10 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| TTHM | 7.1 µg/L 8.9% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L | 9/19 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 5.15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L | 8/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 4.28 pCi/L 29% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.7 pCi/L | 8/13 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.33 pCi/L 67% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.6 pCi/L | 7/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 102.75 µg/L 5.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 103 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 375 µg/L 9.4% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 380 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.756 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.77 µg/L | 5/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.38 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 4.82 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.44 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2.6475 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.75 µg/L | 2/22 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Selenium | 1 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
84 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fairfield Town of
Is Fairfield Town of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Fairfield Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fairfield Town of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fairfield Town of serve?
Fairfield Town of reports serving 718 people in Montana, per its EPA record.
Has Fairfield Town of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 367 violations on file for Fairfield Town of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.