← Montana

Tap water quality report

Conrad Water Dept

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 66 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

66
contaminants tested
14
detected
2,500
people served
14
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Pondera

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

14
health-based violations
19
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-05-01 → 2001-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-05-01 → 2001-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-05-01 → 2001-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-05-01 → 2001-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-05-01 → 2001-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-05-01 → 2001-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2000-05-01 → 2000-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2000-05-01 → 2000-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1997-10-01 → 1997-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1997-10-01 → 1997-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
196.4 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
150 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.84 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L
13/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38 µg/L
13/17 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
38.6 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 41 µg/L
13/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2024
Lead
5 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
11/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
19.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.86 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
42.2 µg/L 70%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 47 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
17.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1.8 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
0.5310 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5400 µg/L
2/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
395 µg/L 9.9%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 400 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2013
52 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBromoformChlorobenzeneCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ZIMBELMAN, DAVID Z
Phone
406-271-5821

Frequently asked questions about Conrad Water Dept

Is Conrad Water Dept tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Conrad Water Dept's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Conrad Water Dept's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Conrad Water Dept serve?

Conrad Water Dept reports serving 2,500 people in Montana, per its EPA record.

Has Conrad Water Dept had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 19 violations on file for Conrad Water Dept, of which 14 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.