Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2023 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Kipling W/A #3-old Scooba Rd
Is Kipling W/A #3-old Scooba Rd tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 1 contaminant in Kipling W/A #3-old Scooba Rd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Kipling W/A #3-old Scooba Rd's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Kipling W/A #3-old Scooba Rd serve?
Kipling W/A #3-old Scooba Rd reports serving 77 people in Mississippi, per its EPA record.
Has Kipling W/A #3-old Scooba Rd had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 3 violations on file for Kipling W/A #3-old Scooba Rd, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.