← Missouri

Tap water quality report

St Charles County Pwsd 2

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 102 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

102
contaminants tested
23
detected
100,587
people served
9
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
St. Charles

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

9
health-based violations
17
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-09-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-09-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-09-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-09-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-12-01 → 1996-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-12-01 → 1996-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-12-01 → 1996-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-12-01 → 1996-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-12-01 → 1996-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0065 µg/L 2/9 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
8.97 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L
163/166 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
25.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 50.1 µg/L
163/166 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
37.695 µg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 53 µg/L
160/161 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
29.02 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36.3 µg/L
159/161 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
5.1875 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.1 µg/L
152/161 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
32.56 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 41.7 µg/L
149/161 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.556 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.03 µg/L
129/166 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
64.215 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 145 µg/L
92/94 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.871 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.14 µg/L
43/161 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
8.9625 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.4 µg/L
26/161 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1442.5 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1610 µg/L
26/36 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.7285 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7300 µg/L
24/166 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
2.404 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.62 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2025
Lead
3.45 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.73 µg/L
15/94 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.245 pCi/L 65%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.3 pCi/L
12/13 SYR4 2014–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
12.05 pCi/L 80%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 15 pCi/L
11/12 SYR4 2014–2015
Lithium
47.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
9/9 UCMR-5 2025
Barium
142.4 µg/L 7.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 147 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
632 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 640 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2014–2017
Atrazine
0.3300 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2016
Monochloroacetic Acid
9.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/161 SYR4 2012–2019
79 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WRIGHT, JIM
Phone
636-385-5197
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about St Charles County Pwsd 2

Is St Charles County Pwsd 2 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in St Charles County Pwsd 2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in St Charles County Pwsd 2's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does St Charles County Pwsd 2 serve?

St Charles County Pwsd 2 reports serving 100,587 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has St Charles County Pwsd 2 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 17 violations on file for St Charles County Pwsd 2, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.