Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1983-01-01 → 1983-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1983-01-01 → 1983-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1983-01-01 → 1983-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1983-01-01 → 1983-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1983-01-01 → 1983-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1983-01-01 → 1983-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 50.125 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 199 µg/L | 100/100 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.0525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.4 µg/L | 96/100 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 59.19 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 206 µg/L | 92/92 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 25.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 56.1 µg/L | 91/92 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 28.78 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 61.2 µg/L | 63/92 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.019 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.2 µg/L | 62/92 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.09 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.82 µg/L | 51/100 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 24.64 µg/L 1.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 172 µg/L | 43/98 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 27/27 | LCR | 2024 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 480 µg/L 4.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 2.597 µg/L 2.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.73 µg/L | 15/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.08 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 9/92 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 5.79 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.33 µg/L | 9/98 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 62.82 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 64.5 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 996 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1010 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 8.779 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.81 µg/L | 3/92 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.3400 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L | 1/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
81 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Jefferson County Pwsd 2
Is Jefferson County Pwsd 2 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Jefferson County Pwsd 2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Jefferson County Pwsd 2's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Jefferson County Pwsd 2 serve?
Jefferson County Pwsd 2 reports serving 16,548 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.
Has Jefferson County Pwsd 2 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 74 violations on file for Jefferson County Pwsd 2, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.