Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-11-01 → 2015-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-11-01 → 2015-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-11-01 → 2015-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-11-01 → 2015-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-11-01 → 2015-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-06-01 → 2015-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 75.89 µg/L 5.8% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 107 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1870 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0016 mg/L 11% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2025 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 20.943 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.4 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 45.345 µg/L 76% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 50.7 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 24.4005 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.3 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Barium | 14.15 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.2 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 15.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.7 µg/L | 3/7 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Cadmium | 2.099 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.15 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 82.19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 86.6 µg/L | 3/7 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Lead | 1.249 µg/L 8.3% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.26 µg/L | 3/18 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 4.017 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.11 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.147 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.15 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.4025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.49 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| TTHM | 103.785 µg/L 130% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 106 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2018–2019 |
| Fluoride | 100 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
53 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Clevenger Branch Members Corp
Is Clevenger Branch Members Corp tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Clevenger Branch Members Corp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Clevenger Branch Members Corp's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Clevenger Branch Members Corp serve?
Clevenger Branch Members Corp reports serving 150 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.
Has Clevenger Branch Members Corp had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 97 violations on file for Clevenger Branch Members Corp, of which 41 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.