Is Fox Woods Subdivision Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Barry

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2002-09-01 → 2002-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2002-09-01 → 2002-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2002-09-01 → 2002-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2002-07-01 → 2002-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2002-07-01 → 2002-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2002-07-01 → 2002-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	1997-07-01 → 1997-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	1997-07-01 → 1997-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	292.6 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 328 µg/L	13/13	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.00080 mg/L 5.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	12/12	LCR	2025
Nitrate-Nitrite	86 µg/L 0.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	12/16	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	22.55 µg/L 150% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L worst single sample: 23.3 µg/L	7/13	SYR4	2013–2019
Barium	40.03 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 40.7 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Chromium	5.616 µg/L 5.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L	2/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Styrene	0.5100 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L	1/3	SYR4	2013–2019

61 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: MC CALL, DOUG
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Fox Woods Subdivision

Is Fox Woods Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 7 contaminants in Fox Woods Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fox Woods Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fox Woods Subdivision serve?

Fox Woods Subdivision reports serving 125 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Fox Woods Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 32 violations on file for Fox Woods Subdivision, of which 19 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.