Is Ozarks Cwc Kimberling City Water Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Stone

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1991-10-08 → 1991-11-07
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1991-10-08 → 1991-11-07
RPT	Monitoring	Unaddressed	2025-07-02
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2019-07-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2011-07-01 → 2011-07-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2011-07-01 → 2011-07-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2011-07-01 → 2011-07-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2011-07-01 → 2011-07-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2011-06-01 → 2011-06-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2011-06-01 → 2011-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	234.2 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 275 µg/L	13/13	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0011 mg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	12/12	LCR	2025
Lead	22.25 µg/L 148% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L worst single sample: 23.7 µg/L	11/13	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane	3.304 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.37 µg/L	7/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromoform	0.9540 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 0.9600 µg/L	7/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Chloroform	2.963 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.99 µg/L	7/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane	3.419 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.62 µg/L	7/7	SYR4	2013–2019
Barium	7.501 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 7.51 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
TTHM	10.213 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 10.3 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Chromium	3.3085 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L worst single sample: 3.42 µg/L	2/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	3.2565 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.37 µg/L	2/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Ethylbenzene	1.755 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L worst single sample: 1.81 µg/L	2/4	SYR4	2013–2019
Fluoride	109.5 µg/L 2.7% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 110 µg/L	2/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Xylenes, Total	9.3905 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L	2/4	SYR4	2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L	1/1	SYR4	2017
Tetrachloroethylene	0.7500 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L	1/4	SYR4	2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	1.1 µg/L 1.8% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L	1/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	1.07 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Trichloroethylene	0.5400 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L	1/4	SYR4	2013–2019

50 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: DEETS, JESSE
Phone: 417-739-4119
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Ozarks Cwc Kimberling City Water

Is Ozarks Cwc Kimberling City Water tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Ozarks Cwc Kimberling City Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ozarks Cwc Kimberling City Water's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ozarks Cwc Kimberling City Water serve?

Ozarks Cwc Kimberling City Water reports serving 200 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Ozarks Cwc Kimberling City Water had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 13 violations on file for Ozarks Cwc Kimberling City Water, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.