Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-06-01 → 2008-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-06-01 → 2008-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-06-01 → 2008-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-06-01 → 2008-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-08-01 → 1996-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-08-01 → 1996-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-08-01 → 1996-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-08-01 → 1996-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 77.34 µg/L 5.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 108 µg/L | 47/47 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 210 µg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 18/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.305 pCi/L 46% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.8 pCi/L | 10/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.082 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.11 µg/L | 9/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.768 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L | 9/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 16.26 pCi/L 108% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 16.4 pCi/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2014 |
| Barium | 130.7 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 131 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.7450 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7600 µg/L | 7/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.419 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 7/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.97819 µg/L 6.6% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9817 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2014 |
| Fluoride | 457 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 460 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 8.744 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.78 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 4.898 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.03 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 6.25 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.41 µg/L | 5/47 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 3.6175 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.68 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.4745 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.48 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.91 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
52 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Jasper County Pwsd 2
Is Jasper County Pwsd 2 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Jasper County Pwsd 2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Jasper County Pwsd 2's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Jasper County Pwsd 2 serve?
Jasper County Pwsd 2 reports serving 3,383 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.
Has Jasper County Pwsd 2 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 31 violations on file for Jasper County Pwsd 2, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.