← Missouri

Tap water quality report

City Utilities of Springfield

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 99 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

99
contaminants tested
21
detected
210,898
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Greene

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
5
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-12-01 → 2020-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-12-01 → 2020-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-12-01 → 2020-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-12-01 → 2020-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0030 µg/L 1/10 2024
PFOS 0.0043 µg/L 1/10 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Dibromochloromethane
6.8635 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.32 µg/L
240/240 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
16.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
239/240 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
59.41 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 123 µg/L
239/240 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
27.595 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38.2 µg/L
224/224 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
85.665 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 152 µg/L
224/224 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
17.09 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.7 µg/L
223/224 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
49.79 µg/L 83%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 67.5 µg/L
203/224 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.16 µg/L
149/224 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.312 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.51 µg/L
69/240 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
8.81 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L
56/224 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1797.5 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2090 µg/L
34/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0051 mg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
18/18 LCR 2025
Barium
69.275 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 72.2 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
930 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1080 µg/L
16/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
21.1085 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.3 µg/L
10/224 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
5.402 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.54 µg/L
7/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
3.6535 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.73 µg/L
4/36 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
0.6900 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
1/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
10.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/10 UCMR-5 2024
78 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
QUINN, KELLI
Phone
417-831-8881
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about City Utilities of Springfield

Is City Utilities of Springfield tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in City Utilities of Springfield's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City Utilities of Springfield's water?

EPA monitoring detected Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City Utilities of Springfield serve?

City Utilities of Springfield reports serving 210,898 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has City Utilities of Springfield had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 5 violations on file for City Utilities of Springfield, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.