← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Republic

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 99 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

99
contaminants tested
14
detected
16,100
people served
17
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Greene

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

17
health-based violations
39
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
85.235 µg/L 6.6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 107 µg/L
70/72 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
4.15 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.6 µg/L
37/72 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
99.9 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L
22/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0025 mg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
21/21 LCR 2025
Barium
82.035 µg/L 4.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 83.3 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
574.5 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 580 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
2.552 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.66 µg/L
10/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.284 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.34 µg/L
9/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
0.7700 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7800 µg/L
5/25 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
4.694 µg/L 5.9%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.78 µg/L
5/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
2.2205 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.24 µg/L
4/22 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
15.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/8 UCMR-5 2024
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.2695 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.28 µg/L
2/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.6765 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.75 µg/L
2/13 SYR4 2013–2019
85 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BESETT, BRAD
Phone
417-827-7259
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Republic

Is Republic tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Republic's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Republic's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Republic serve?

Republic reports serving 16,100 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Republic had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 39 violations on file for Republic, of which 17 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.