← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Carl Junction

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 99 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

99
contaminants tested
17
detected
8,142
people served
16
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Jasper

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

16
health-based violations
26
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-02-01 → 2004-02-29
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-02-01 → 2004-02-29
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-02-01 → 2004-02-29
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-02-01 → 2004-02-29
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-07-01 → 2001-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-07-01 → 2001-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-07-01 → 2001-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-07-01 → 2001-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-10-01 → 1998-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-10-01 → 1998-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
47.86 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 80.3 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
19/19 LCR 2023
Barium
142.2 µg/L 7.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 143 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
758 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 790 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
33 µg/L
No EPA limit set
14/14 UCMR-5 2025
Nitrate-Nitrite
18 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
12/94 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.15 pCi/L 43%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.2 pCi/L
11/11 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
2.52 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.16 µg/L
11/57 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.3885 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.84 µg/L
10/27 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
3.416 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.56 µg/L
10/17 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.985 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.39 µg/L
10/27 SYR4 2013–2019
Xylenes, Total
264 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 320 µg/L
9/19 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
4.334 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.58 µg/L
8/27 SYR4 2013–2019
Ethylbenzene
61.02 µg/L 8.7%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 65.4 µg/L
4/19 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
3.6125 µg/L 4.5%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.68 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
0.5775 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5800 µg/L
2/27 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.3915 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.41 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2013–2019
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
POWERS, MARK
Phone
417-649-7237

Frequently asked questions about Carl Junction

Is Carl Junction tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Carl Junction's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Carl Junction's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Barium, Fluoride, Lithium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Carl Junction serve?

Carl Junction reports serving 8,142 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Carl Junction had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 26 violations on file for Carl Junction, of which 16 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.