← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Caruthersville

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 98 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

98
contaminants tested
15
detected
5,518
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Pemiscot

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
19
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-02
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-06-01 → 2024-06-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-06-01 → 2024-06-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-06-01 → 2024-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
180 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 345 µg/L
65/65 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0114 mg/L 76%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
25/25 LCR 2024
Lead
5.6845 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.43 µg/L
24/65 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
18 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
14/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
1.623 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.63 µg/L
8/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
0.8275 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8400 µg/L
6/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
142.6 µg/L 7.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 144 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
2.57 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.62 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
1.0695 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.07 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.908 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.95 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
129 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Lithium
33.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/2 UCMR-5 2023
Dibromochloromethane
0.5500 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GRANTHAM, SUE
Phone
573-333-2142

Frequently asked questions about Caruthersville

Is Caruthersville tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Caruthersville's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Caruthersville's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Caruthersville serve?

Caruthersville reports serving 5,518 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Caruthersville had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 19 violations on file for Caruthersville, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.