Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1998-09-01 → 1998-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1998-09-01 → 1998-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1998-09-01 → 1998-09-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-05-21 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-02-21 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2024-11-01 → 2024-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2024-11-01 → 2024-11-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0126 µg/L | 4/4 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 104.29 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 172 µg/L | 94/96 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14.28 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.9 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 34.39 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38.3 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.77 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.8 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 10.902 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.6 µg/L | 48/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 56.9 µg/L 71% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 62.7 µg/L | 46/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.8275 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 42/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 17.925 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.4 µg/L | 36/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4.54 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.7 µg/L | 33/96 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 15.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.5 µg/L | 33/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 226.5 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0036 mg/L 24% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 26/26 | LCR | 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 41.17 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.4 µg/L | 10/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 59.356 µg/L 59% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 97.1 µg/L | 9/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Barium | 264.75 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 266 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Fluoride | 855 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 860 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Arsenic | 3.1095 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.22 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 8.6985 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.75 µg/L | 2/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 10.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
78 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Cape Girardeau
Is Cape Girardeau tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Cape Girardeau's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Cape Girardeau's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Cape Girardeau serve?
Cape Girardeau reports serving 39,941 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.
Has Cape Girardeau had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 67 violations on file for Cape Girardeau, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.