← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Happy Acres

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 15 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

15
contaminants tested
12
detected
50
people served
54
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Pettis

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

54
health-based violations
260
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-06-19
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-06-19
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-06-19
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-06-19
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-06-19
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-12
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-12
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-12
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-12
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-12-29

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0014 mg/L 9.1%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2025
Nitrate-Nitrite
60 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2013
Bromodichloromethane
15.43 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.7 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012
Chloroform
65.035 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 65.2 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012
Dibromochloromethane
5.723 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.88 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012
Bromoform
2.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2012
Copper
8.73 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Dichloroacetic Acid
14.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2012
Fluoride
690 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
TTHM
74.9 µg/L 94%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
19.9 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Trichloroacetic Acid
5.19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2012
3 contaminants tested, none detected
Dibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
AGUILAR, MAGNO
Phone
660-826-4046
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Happy Acres

Is Happy Acres tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Happy Acres's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Happy Acres's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Happy Acres serve?

Happy Acres reports serving 50 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Happy Acres had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 260 violations on file for Happy Acres, of which 54 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.