Tap WaterIndex

← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Fort Leonard Wood

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 102 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

102
contaminants tested
21
detected
34,000
people served
0
health-based violations
Missouri rankingsLead in MissouriPFAS in Missouri
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Federal government
Counties served
Pulaski

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
48
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 1988-07-01 → 1988-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1988-07-01 → 1988-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1988-07-01 → 1988-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1988-07-01 → 1988-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1988-07-01 → 1988-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1988-07-01 → 1988-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1988-07-01 → 1988-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1988-07-01 → 1988-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1988-07-01 → 1988-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1988-07-01 → 1988-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0048 µg/L 1/32 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
68.275 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 267 µg/L
146/152 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13.76 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.4 µg/L
139/152 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.301 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.66 µg/L
135/152 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
2990 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3560 µg/L
132/142 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
26.24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.6 µg/L
127/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
20.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.5 µg/L
127/128 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
83.525 µg/L 104%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 111 µg/L
126/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
48.96 µg/L 82%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 66.4 µg/L
117/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
75.765 µg/L 5.8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 456 µg/L
114/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
5.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.78 µg/L
34/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0015 mg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 25/25 LCR 2024
Barium
158.1 µg/L 7.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 192 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
6.29 µg/L 6.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.47 µg/L
21/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
7.4825 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.3 µg/L
14/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.664 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.79 µg/L
10/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1996 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2500 µg/L
9/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
11.938 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.4 µg/L
4/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1.469 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.48 µg/L
2/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.5855 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5900 µg/L
2/152 SYR4 2012–2019
Toluene
0.9300 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
 1/24 SYR4 2012–2019
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SIMPSON, KENNETH
Phone
573-586-4240
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Fort Leonard Wood

Is Fort Leonard Wood tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Fort Leonard Wood's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fort Leonard Wood's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Nitrate-Nitrite, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fort Leonard Wood serve?

Fort Leonard Wood reports serving 34,000 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Fort Leonard Wood had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 48 violations on file for Fort Leonard Wood, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.