Tap WaterIndex

← Missouri

Tap water quality report

St Tropez Subdivision

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 63 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

63
contaminants tested
5
detected
79
people served
0
health-based violations
Missouri rankingsLead in MissouriPFAS in Missouri
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Camden

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
17
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-12-15
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate-Nitrite
100 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0013 mg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 11/11 LCR 2024
Copper
192.2 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 216 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
819 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 824 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
1.06 µg/L 7.1%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2018
58 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ETLING, KATHY
Phone
573-348-2868
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about St Tropez Subdivision

Is St Tropez Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in St Tropez Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in St Tropez Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Copper, Barium, Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does St Tropez Subdivision serve?

St Tropez Subdivision reports serving 79 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has St Tropez Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 17 violations on file for St Tropez Subdivision, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.