Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-07-01 → 2014-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-07-01 → 2014-07-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 144.2 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 258 µg/L | 129/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 9.224 µg/L 61% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.3 µg/L | 77/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.44 pCi/L 69% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4 pCi/L | 47/48 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 20.05 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 40/208 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 187.7 µg/L 9.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 203 µg/L | 39/39 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Fluoride | 1515 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1640 µg/L | 39/39 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lithium | 68.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 26/26 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Lead | 0.0035 mg/L 23% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 24/24 | LCR | 2024 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.2 µg/L | 15/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 10.475 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.9 µg/L | 14/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.366 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.13 µg/L | 13/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 4.582 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L | 13/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 6.236 µg/L 6.2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.41 µg/L | 13/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 39.84 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 53 µg/L | 8/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 17 pCi/L 113% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 17.2 pCi/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.639 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.67 µg/L | 3/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.1 µg/L 3.7% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dichloromethane | 0.6200 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/39 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.32 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.15 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
82 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Boone County Cons Pwsd 1
Is Boone County Cons Pwsd 1 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Boone County Cons Pwsd 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Boone County Cons Pwsd 1's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Nitrate-Nitrite, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Boone County Cons Pwsd 1 serve?
Boone County Cons Pwsd 1 reports serving 24,700 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.
Has Boone County Cons Pwsd 1 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 24 violations on file for Boone County Cons Pwsd 1, of which 22 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.