← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Boone County Cons Pwsd 1

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 102 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

102
contaminants tested
20
detected
24,700
people served
22
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Boone

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

22
health-based violations
24
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
144.2 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 258 µg/L
129/129 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
9.224 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.3 µg/L
77/129 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.44 pCi/L 69%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4 pCi/L
47/48 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
20.05 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
40/208 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
187.7 µg/L 9.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 203 µg/L
39/39 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
1515 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1640 µg/L
39/39 SYR4 2012–2018
Lithium
68.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
26/26 UCMR-5 2024
Lead
0.0035 mg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
24/24 LCR 2024
Dibromochloromethane
10.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.2 µg/L
15/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
10.475 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.9 µg/L
14/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
3.366 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.13 µg/L
13/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
4.582 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L
13/53 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
6.236 µg/L 6.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.41 µg/L
13/51 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
39.84 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 53 µg/L
8/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
17 pCi/L 113%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 17.2 pCi/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.639 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.67 µg/L
3/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
1.1 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloromethane
0.6200 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/39 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.32 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/14 SYR4 2012–2019
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CRANE, TANNER
Phone
573-449-8723
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Boone County Cons Pwsd 1

Is Boone County Cons Pwsd 1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Boone County Cons Pwsd 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Boone County Cons Pwsd 1's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Nitrate-Nitrite, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Boone County Cons Pwsd 1 serve?

Boone County Cons Pwsd 1 reports serving 24,700 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Boone County Cons Pwsd 1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 24 violations on file for Boone County Cons Pwsd 1, of which 22 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.