Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2026-01-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2026-01-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2026-01-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2026-01-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2026-01-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-07-02 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 116 µg/L 8.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1490 µg/L | 101/103 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 8.394 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.4 µg/L | 77/85 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.988 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.66 µg/L | 77/85 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 38.46 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 54 µg/L | 69/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 27.62 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41.6 µg/L | 68/85 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4.55 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.1 µg/L | 46/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 19.91 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.9 µg/L | 32/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 12.15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 31/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.132 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.29 µg/L | 25/85 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0017 mg/L 11% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 25/25 | LCR | 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 32.605 µg/L 54% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.9 µg/L | 24/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 160 µg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/78 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 495.2 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 839 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Fluoride | 700 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.585 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.62 µg/L | 8/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.32 pCi/L 66% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.5 pCi/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Chromium | 5.135 µg/L 5.1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L | 6/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lithium | 14 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/10 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 8.8625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.99 µg/L | 4/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 12.805 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.2 µg/L | 3/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.5700 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.5800 µg/L | 2/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Xylenes, Total | 1.01 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
77 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Sedalia
Is Sedalia tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Sedalia's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Sedalia's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Sedalia serve?
Sedalia reports serving 21,725 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.
Has Sedalia had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 61 violations on file for Sedalia, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.