← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Sedalia

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 99 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

99
contaminants tested
22
detected
21,725
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Pettis

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
61
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-12-31
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2026-01-01
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2026-01-01
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2026-01-01
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2026-01-01
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2026-01-01
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-02

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
116 µg/L 8.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1490 µg/L
101/103 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
8.394 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.4 µg/L
77/85 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.988 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.66 µg/L
77/85 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
38.46 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 54 µg/L
69/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
27.62 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41.6 µg/L
68/85 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.55 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.1 µg/L
46/102 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
19.91 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.9 µg/L
32/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
12.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
31/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.132 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.29 µg/L
25/85 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0017 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
25/25 LCR 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
32.605 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.9 µg/L
24/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
160 µg/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
495.2 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 839 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2017
Fluoride
700 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.585 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.62 µg/L
8/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.32 pCi/L 66%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.5 pCi/L
7/7 SYR4 2015–2018
Chromium
5.135 µg/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L
6/30 SYR4 2012–2017
Lithium
14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/10 UCMR-5 2024
Monobromoacetic Acid
8.8625 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.99 µg/L
4/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
12.805 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.2 µg/L
3/72 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
0.5700 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.5800 µg/L
2/20 SYR4 2012–2017
Xylenes, Total
1.01 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/13 SYR4 2012–2017
77 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DAWSON, ANDREW
Phone
660-827-3000

Frequently asked questions about Sedalia

Is Sedalia tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Sedalia's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Sedalia's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Sedalia serve?

Sedalia reports serving 21,725 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Sedalia had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 61 violations on file for Sedalia, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.