← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Fulton

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 99 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

99
contaminants tested
17
detected
12,600
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Callaway

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
12
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-07-01 → 2004-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-07-01 → 2004-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-07-01 → 2004-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-07-01 → 2004-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-12-01 → 2001-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-12-01 → 2001-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-12-01 → 2001-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-12-01 → 2001-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
140.95 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 194 µg/L
102/102 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
20 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
58/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
5.465 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L
51/102 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0040 mg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
25/25 LCR 2024
Dibromochloromethane
5.755 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.97 µg/L
16/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
7.224 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.59 µg/L
14/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
8.6985 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.7 µg/L
14/26 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
24.38 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
13/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
8.427 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.68 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
1087 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1120 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromoform
1.928 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.98 µg/L
9/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.38 pCi/L 68%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.7 pCi/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
49.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/8 UCMR-5 2024
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.884 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.05 µg/L
5/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
3.1135 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.25 µg/L
4/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.5435 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.61 µg/L
2/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
9.471 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.91 µg/L
2/14 SYR4 2012–2019
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WILSON, JIM
Phone
573-592-3170
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Fulton

Is Fulton tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Fulton's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fulton's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fulton serve?

Fulton reports serving 12,600 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Fulton had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for Fulton, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.