Is Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1 Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Scotland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-07-01
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2003-07-01
MR	Monitoring	Archived	1992-01-01 → 1992-01-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	1992-01-01 → 1992-01-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).

Contaminant	Max	Detection rate	Period
Pfba	0.0120 µg/L	3/4	2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Bromodichloromethane	12.34 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 20.5 µg/L	54/54	SYR4	2013–2019
Chloroform	67.07 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 129 µg/L	54/54	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.8155 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L	54/54	SYR4	2013–2019
TTHM	76.48 µg/L 96% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 153 µg/L	54/54	SYR4	2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	21.88 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 35.9 µg/L	53/53	SYR4	2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	30.235 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 44.6 µg/L	52/53	SYR4	2013–2019
Copper	137.3 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 188 µg/L	50/50	SYR4	2012–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	52.435 µg/L 87% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 81.6 µg/L	50/53	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	19/19	LCR	2024
Lead	4.034 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 4.46 µg/L	7/50	SYR4	2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid	8.825 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 9.87 µg/L	6/53	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	1.365 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.38 µg/L	4/53	SYR4	2013–2019

31 contaminants tested, none detected

11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformHfpo-DaMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact: BRADLEY, TONYA
Phone: 660-465-7200
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1

Is Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1 serve?

Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1 reports serving 3,360 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 4 violations on file for Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.