Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0054 µg/L | 2/4 | 2023 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 131 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 151 µg/L | 61/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.41 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.5 µg/L | 54/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 35.92 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 54.4 µg/L | 53/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 138 µg/L 173% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 167 µg/L | 53/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 24.39 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.2 µg/L | 52/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 58.89 µg/L 98% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 79.8 µg/L | 50/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 203 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 330 µg/L | 36/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.6745 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.33 µg/L | 28/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 20/20 | LCR | 2026 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 3120 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 3.242 µg/L 108% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.37 µg/L | 9/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 79.415 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 79.8 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1219 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1240 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 5.552 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.93 µg/L | 7/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 1.796 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.88 µg/L | 5/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 14.54 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.6 µg/L | 4/53 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 1.677 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.68 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Vinyl Chloride | 1.04 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
78 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Monroe City
Is Monroe City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Monroe City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Monroe City's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Monroe City serve?
Monroe City reports serving 2,500 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.
Has Monroe City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 156 violations on file for Monroe City, of which 126 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.