Tap WaterIndex

← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Ray County Cons Pwsd 2

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 99 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

99
contaminants tested
19
detected
9,360
people served
5
health-based violations
Missouri rankingsLead in MissouriPFAS in Missouri
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Caldwell, Clay, Ray

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
5
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-09-01 → 2005-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
208.3 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 226 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2014–2018
Lead
0.0035 mg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 22/22 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
19.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.4 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
40.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 45.7 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
20 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
9.57 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L
15/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.166 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.42 µg/L
15/43 SYR4 2014–2018
Bromoform
1.264 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.29 µg/L
14/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.098 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.15 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.875 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.2 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
69.68 µg/L 87%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 76.7 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
29.765 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 31 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
8.142 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.48 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.612 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.63 µg/L
4/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
495.7 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 528 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Fluoride
279 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 290 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Chromium
2.5825 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.64 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Lithium
22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/2 UCMR-5 2023
Arsenic
2.02 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2014–2018
80 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HOWELL, JESSE
Phone
816-496-3611

Frequently asked questions about Ray County Cons Pwsd 2

Is Ray County Cons Pwsd 2 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Ray County Cons Pwsd 2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ray County Cons Pwsd 2's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Nitrate-Nitrite, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ray County Cons Pwsd 2 serve?

Ray County Cons Pwsd 2 reports serving 9,360 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Ray County Cons Pwsd 2 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 5 violations on file for Ray County Cons Pwsd 2, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.