Is Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2 Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Johnson, Lafayette, Saline

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).

Contaminant	Max	Detection rate	Period
Pfba	0.0095 µg/L	2/20	2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	328.75 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 384 µg/L	60/60	SYR4	2014–2018
Bromodichloromethane	27.715 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 42.7 µg/L	48/48	SYR4	2013–2019
Chloroform	109 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 110 µg/L	48/48	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane	18.1 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 27.9 µg/L	48/48	SYR4	2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	33.65 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 40.2 µg/L	48/48	SYR4	2013–2019
TTHM	132 µg/L 165% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L worst single sample: 138 µg/L	48/48	SYR4	2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	59.01 µg/L 98% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 64 µg/L	48/48	SYR4	2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	24.695 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 27.5 µg/L	48/48	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	5.5845 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 20.7 µg/L	24/60	SYR4	2014–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid	5.1315 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.55 µg/L	22/48	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0015 mg/L 9.9% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	22/22	LCR	2024
Monobromoacetic Acid	9.2295 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 10.7 µg/L	18/48	SYR4	2013–2019
Lithium	25 µg/L No EPA limit set	13/20	UCMR-5	2024
Bromoform	3.463 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.67 µg/L	10/48	SYR4	2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	18.2 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/48	SYR4	2013–2019

28 contaminants tested, none detected

11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfuna

Utility contact

Contact: WINTER, TAMMIE
Phone: 660-584-2344
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2

Is Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2 serve?

Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2 reports serving 7,180 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 60 violations on file for Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2, of which 60 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.