Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 63.71 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 275 µg/L | 59/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 38.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44.7 µg/L | 51/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 7.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.39 µg/L | 51/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 54.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 66.5 µg/L | 51/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 31.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L | 51/51 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.2 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 132 µg/L 165% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 151 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.63 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.93 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 6.296 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.73 µg/L | 47/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 33.95 µg/L 57% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 35.6 µg/L | 43/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0033 mg/L 22% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 31/31 | LCR | 2024 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 110 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 10.72 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 15/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 12.45 µg/L 83% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 24.8 µg/L | 14/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Arsenic | 2.7175 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.75 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Barium | 31.495 µg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 31.5 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chromium | 4.173 µg/L 4.2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.27 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 129.5 µg/L 3.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lithium | 30.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.01 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/49 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
79 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Odessa
Is Odessa tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Odessa's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Odessa's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Odessa serve?
Odessa reports serving 5,202 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.
Has Odessa had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 99 violations on file for Odessa, of which 65 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.