← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Liberty

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 98 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

98
contaminants tested
19
detected
30,800
people served
22
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Clay

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

22
health-based violations
114
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
39.44 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 142 µg/L
109/112 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
34.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.3 µg/L
76/76 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
13.44 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.5 µg/L
64/68 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
70.3 µg/L 88%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 79.9 µg/L
51/69 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
19.365 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.5 µg/L
48/76 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
12.02 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.6 µg/L
37/76 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
7.016 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.41 µg/L
37/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.8225 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.96 µg/L
36/76 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
30.16 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 33.4 µg/L
35/69 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
8.926 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.5 µg/L
33/111 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.79 µg/L
31/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0046 mg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
20/20 LCR 2024
Nitrate-Nitrite
95 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
12.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.4 µg/L
7/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
3.24 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.27 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2013–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
8.513 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.62 µg/L
3/68 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
95.11 µg/L 4.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 97.2 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
835 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 870 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Lithium
31.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/2 UCMR-5 2024
79 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
NOLL, ANDY
Phone
816-439-4510
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Liberty

Is Liberty tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Liberty's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Liberty's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Liberty serve?

Liberty reports serving 30,800 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Liberty had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 114 violations on file for Liberty, of which 22 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.