← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Cameron

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 99 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

99
contaminants tested
21
detected
11,963
people served
13
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Clinton

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

13
health-based violations
37
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-04-01 → 2009-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chlorite
830 µg/L 83%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 910 µg/L
288/288 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
93.285 µg/L 117%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 147 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
54.9 µg/L 91%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 68 µg/L
96/96 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
144.65 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 379 µg/L
88/88 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
18.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.3 µg/L
86/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
68.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 125 µg/L
86/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.98 µg/L
86/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
37.965 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.7 µg/L
78/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
12.62 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.3 µg/L
77/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.6265 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.98 µg/L
50/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
15.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.2 µg/L
21/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0014 mg/L 9.4%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2024
Bromoform
1.41 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.56 µg/L
16/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
850 µg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
7.275 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.31 µg/L
15/88 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
0.8250 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9600 µg/L
11/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
87.825 µg/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 88 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
673 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 680 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
1.417 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.42 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
8.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.91 µg/L
2/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Simazine
0.2600 µg/L 6.5%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
1/32 SYR4 2012–2019
78 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
RASMUSSEN, STEVE
Phone
816-632-2177
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Cameron

Is Cameron tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Cameron's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cameron's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chlorite, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cameron serve?

Cameron reports serving 11,963 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Cameron had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 37 violations on file for Cameron, of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.