Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1999-05-01 → 1999-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1999-05-01 → 1999-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1999-05-01 → 1999-05-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 554.3 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1280 µg/L | 90/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 11.17 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 51 µg/L | 60/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1200 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 38/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1200 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1300 µg/L | 34/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 31/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 4.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L | 29/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.895 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L | 28/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.58 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L | 17/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 17/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0040 mg/L 27% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Barium | 373.55 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 395 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Arsenic | 7.137 µg/L 71% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.44 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Lithium | 10.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/8 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 7 pCi/L 47% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2016–2019 |
85 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Monticello
Is Monticello tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Monticello's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Monticello's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Fluoride, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Monticello serve?
Monticello reports serving 15,087 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.
Has Monticello had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 3 violations on file for Monticello, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.