← Minnesota

Tap water quality report

Hugo

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 102 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

102
contaminants tested
13
detected
12,047
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Washington

Compliance record

No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations recorded for this supplier.

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0198 µg/L 8/10 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
414.4 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 997 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
1270 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1700 µg/L
34/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
974 µg/L 9.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L
34/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
2.145 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
32/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Chloroform
3.995 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L
28/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
27/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
18/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.765 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
10/28 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/28 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
1.1055 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.11 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
30.6 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2012–2018
89 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Phone
6517626315
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Hugo

Is Hugo tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Hugo's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Hugo's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Hugo serve?

Hugo reports serving 12,047 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.

Has Hugo had any water quality violations?

The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Hugo.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.