Compliance record
PFAS detected
PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest
nationwide test results (2023–2025).
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 670.2 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1030 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 5.125 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L | 56/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1100 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 33/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 220 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 11 µg/L No EPA limit set | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 14.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 14/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.465 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.7535 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.78 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Barium | 295.55 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 298 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Mercury | 0.0120 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
79 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Waite Park
Is Waite Park tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Waite Park's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Waite Park's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Fluoride, Nitrate-Nitrite, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Waite Park serve?
Waite Park reports serving 8,354 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.
Has Waite Park had any water quality violations?
The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Waite Park.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.