← Minnesota

Tap water quality report

Becker

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 101 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

101
contaminants tested
21
detected
5,034
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Sherburne

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
12
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0200 µg/L 8/8 2024
PFBS 0.0096 µg/L 8/8 2024
Pfpea 0.0049 µg/L 4/8 2024
PFOS 0.0046 µg/L 2/8 2024
Pfhxa 0.0036 µg/L 1/8 2024
PFOA 0.0043 µg/L 1/8 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate-Nitrite
6435 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7000 µg/L
154/154 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
841.35 µg/L 65%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
1100 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1200 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
2.385 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
30/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
7.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8 µg/L
9/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
10.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
9/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
7/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
4.91 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
6/6 LCR 2023
Barium
86.625 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 87.3 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2016
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1.095 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
2/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1.93 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2014–2016
80 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Phone
7632614302
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Becker

Is Becker tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Becker's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Becker's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Fluoride, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Becker serve?

Becker reports serving 5,034 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.

Has Becker had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for Becker, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.