Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 8300 µg/L 83% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 9800 µg/L | 426/426 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 203.5 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 284 µg/L | 90/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 5.35 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L | 76/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1145 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1200 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.32 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L | 27/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.37 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L | 27/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 6.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 25/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 21.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 23/26 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Bromoform | 2.365 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L | 20/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.34 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 20/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.97 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 14/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0030 mg/L 20% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2025 |
| Chromium | 1.003 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 12/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 320.5 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 390 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.79 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 7/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 4.54 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.6 pCi/L | 2/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2.39 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Toluene | 1.1 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
80 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Shakopee
Is Shakopee tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Shakopee's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Shakopee's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Lead, Fluoride, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Shakopee serve?
Shakopee reports serving 47,000 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.
Has Shakopee had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 5 violations on file for Shakopee, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.