Tap WaterIndex

← Minnesota

Tap water quality report

Warroad

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 48 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

48
contaminants tested
11
detected
1,857
people served
6
health-based violations
Minnesota rankingsLead in MinnesotaPFAS in Minnesota
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Roseau

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
28
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-30 → 2008-08-07
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-30 → 2008-08-07
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-30 → 2008-08-07
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-30 → 2008-08-07
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-30 → 2008-08-07
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-30 → 2008-08-07
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Arsenic
10.66 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.3 µg/L
35/35 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1340 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
478.95 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 535 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
0.8600 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L
5/17 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
93.21 µg/L 4.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 95.4 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2016
Lead
7.425 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.4 µg/L
4/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
0.3000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/17 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 1/3 SYR4 2018
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 1/1 LCR 2023
Toluene
0.5500 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
 1/9 SYR4 2013–2019
37 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteNitriteSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Phone
2183861454
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Warroad

Is Warroad tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Warroad's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Warroad's water?

EPA monitoring detected Arsenic, Fluoride, Copper, Dichloroacetic Acid, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Warroad serve?

Warroad reports serving 1,857 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.

Has Warroad had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 28 violations on file for Warroad, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.