Tap WaterIndex

← Minnesota

Tap water quality report

Mn Correctional Facility - Faribault

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 47 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

47
contaminants tested
11
detected
2,103
people served
0
health-based violations
Minnesota rankingsLead in MinnesotaPFAS in Minnesota
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Rice

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
27
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2012-01-01 → 2012-01-17
MR Monitoring Resolved 2012-01-01 → 2012-01-17

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
1200 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1300 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
1353 µg/L 104%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1600 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
6.96 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L
8/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
18.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
8/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.43 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
8/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
5.545 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
6.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 8/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
17.61 µg/L 117%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 23.1 µg/L
7/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
13.7 pCi/L 91%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 14 pCi/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2015
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 4/4 LCR 2023
Barium
139.75 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2019
36 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Phone
5073324506
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Mn Correctional Facility - Faribault

Is Mn Correctional Facility - Faribault tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Mn Correctional Facility - Faribault's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mn Correctional Facility - Faribault's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mn Correctional Facility - Faribault serve?

Mn Correctional Facility - Faribault reports serving 2,103 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.

Has Mn Correctional Facility - Faribault had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 27 violations on file for Mn Correctional Facility - Faribault, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.