Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-10-01 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 400.65 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 640 µg/L | 90/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 6.28 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 39.5 µg/L | 63/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 23.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 82 µg/L | 49/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.695 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L | 42/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1340 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2500 µg/L | 33/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 31/68 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 9.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48 µg/L | 31/47 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.065 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 30/47 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2022 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 12 pCi/L 80% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 11/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 0.2650 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.2700 µg/L | 6/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Barium | 75.88 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 76.7 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2014 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.095 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 2/47 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 12.46 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 2/47 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 190 µg/L 1.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/88 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.54 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2014 |
| Ethylbenzene | 1.7 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toluene | 1.7 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
81 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about White Bear Township
Is White Bear Township tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in White Bear Township's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in White Bear Township's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does White Bear Township serve?
White Bear Township reports serving 11,699 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.
Has White Bear Township had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 3 violations on file for White Bear Township, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.