← Minnesota

Tap water quality report

Roseville

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 42 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

42
contaminants tested
10
detected
35,343
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Ramsey

Compliance record

No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations recorded for this supplier.

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0148 µg/L 4/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
8.365 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.7 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
42.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 45 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
66.6 µg/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
90/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
66/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L
46/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
9.59 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L
44/90 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0060 mg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
32 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformDibromoacetic AcidHfpo-DaMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Phone
6517927021
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Roseville

Is Roseville tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Roseville's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Roseville's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Roseville serve?

Roseville reports serving 35,343 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.

Has Roseville had any water quality violations?

The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Roseville.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.