Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-07-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-07-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-11-01 → 2007-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-11-01 → 2007-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-11-01 → 2007-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-11-01 → 2007-11-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride | 1340 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L | 33/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 943.5 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1230 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 4.37 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L | 20/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 5.74 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 5.72 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.73 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.225 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.43 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.5075 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5100 µg/L | 6/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 31.475 µg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 31.5 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0070 mg/L 47% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 2/2 | LCR | 2024 |
60 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Rich Prairie Sewer and Water District
Is Rich Prairie Sewer and Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Rich Prairie Sewer and Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Rich Prairie Sewer and Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Rich Prairie Sewer and Water District serve?
Rich Prairie Sewer and Water District reports serving 1,531 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.
Has Rich Prairie Sewer and Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 31 violations on file for Rich Prairie Sewer and Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.