← Minnesota

Tap water quality report

Northrop

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 48 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

48
contaminants tested
12
detected
211
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Martin

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
6
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
1400 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1500 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1600 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
159.8 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 203 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Chloroform
9.375 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
2.55 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
6/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
4.49 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.5 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
7.48 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
3.03 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0070 mg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
2/2 LCR 2023
Arsenic
1.06 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
36 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Phone
5072361612
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Northrop

Is Northrop tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Northrop's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Northrop's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Chloroform, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Northrop serve?

Northrop reports serving 211 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.

Has Northrop had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 6 violations on file for Northrop, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.