Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2013-10-01 → 2013-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2013-10-01 → 2013-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2013-10-01 → 2013-10-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-10-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-10-31 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0075 µg/L | 3/4 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 10.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 139/139 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 61.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 160 µg/L | 139/139 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 32 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38 µg/L | 132/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 131/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.99 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 115/139 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 101.12 µg/L 7.8% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 515 µg/L | 109/109 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 19.68 µg/L 131% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 315 µg/L | 85/109 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 9720 µg/L 97% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 12000 µg/L | 68/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.3 µg/L | 63/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chlorite | 0.7896 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9160 µg/L | 34/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2013 |
| Fluoride | 1200 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1300 µg/L | 33/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.61 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 19/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2024 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.46 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 9/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 0.6625 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6800 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2014–2015 |
| Benzene | 5.5 µg/L 110% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L | 5/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 18 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/4 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Bromoform | 0.8000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/138 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toluene | 0.2500 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroethylene | 0.2800 µg/L 5.6% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
71 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fairmont
Is Fairmont tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Fairmont's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fairmont's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fairmont serve?
Fairmont reports serving 10,328 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.
Has Fairmont had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 16 violations on file for Fairmont, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.